Rapporten er nådeløs, skriver Soeren Kern. “Stillhetens konspirasjon” ble først
brutt i 2010, da en gjeng bestående av 13 muslimske men ble arrestert i Derbyshire etter en under cover politiaksjon. Rundt 100 mindreårige jenter var ofre for gjengen.
Såkalt grooming foregår
antakelig i enhver større by i England og Wales, viser rapporten på over 300 sider, «Easy Meat:
Multiculturalism, Islam and Child Sex Slavery,» og det systematiske misbruket har pågått siden 80-tallet.
Jeg tror vi kan si det slik: hadde det vært motsatt, at hvite britiske menn notorisk
misbrukte mindreårige jenter med ikke-britisk bakgrunn, hadde det straks ført til nasjonal oppstandelse. Foregår dette også i Norge? Det er umulig ikke å tenke tanken.
er knusende. Det sies rett ut at mennene misbruker mindreårige jenter fordi de vil ha jomfruer og jenter uten smittbare sykdommer – slik at de ikke smitter sine egne hustruer. Det finnes ikke ett kjent tilfelle av ikke-muslimske menn som systematisk
misbruker muslimske jenter. Er islamsk ideologi medskyldig? Ja, sies det i rapporten. Det samme gjelder ideen om multikulturalisme.
Hvis ikke det tas solide grep, vil misbruket kun øke og øke,
heter det. Rapporten er utarbeidet av Law And Freedom Foundation
Rather than taking steps to protect British children, however, police, social workers, teachers, neighbors, politicians and the media deliberately
downplayed the severity of the crimes perpetrated by the grooming gangs in order to avoid being accused of «Islamophobia» or racism.
The conspiracy of silence was not broken until November 2010, when
it was leaked that police in Derbyshire had carried out an undercover investigation—dubbed Operation Retriever—and arrested 13 members of a Muslim gang for grooming up to 100 underage girls
Shortly thereafter, the Times of London published the results of a groundbreaking investigation
into the sexual exploitation and internal trafficking of girls in the Midlands and the north of England. In January 2011, the newspaper reported that in 17 court cases since 1997 in which groups of men were prosecuted for grooming 11 to 16 year old girls,
53 of the 56 men found guilty were Asian, 50 of them Muslim, and just three were white.
In September 2012, the Times published
another exposé that revealed the hidden truth about the sale and extensive use of British children for sex. The article showed that organized groups of Muslim men were able to groom, pimp and traffic girls across the country with virtual impunity.
Although offenders were identified to police, they were not prosecuted. A child welfare expert interviewed by the newspaper said the government’s reluctance to tackle such street grooming networks represented «the biggest child protection scandal
of our time.»
But the latest study—which avoids sensational details and confines itself to exposing where officialdom has failed—demonstrates that even the coverage in the Times has
understated the scale of the problem:
«There is far more to this story than has come out so far. The population are already outraged by what they have learned in the last year or two, but know only a fraction
of the scandal… This massive over-representation of Muslim men in this crime spree has been borne out by the prosecutions of the last three to four years, but it is clear that it must have been known long ago and should have been made public. Because
the predators were Muslims, the agencies responsible for child-protection have almost entirely failed in their job to protect vulnerable children. From a fear of being called ‘racist,’ police forces across the country have buried the evidence.»
«On the rare occasion when the phenomenon [of child grooming] would be discussed in more than the briefest details, political activists and the authorities would come together to stop the public from knowing more. Political
correctness would be used to make sure that people did not speak about this phenomenon, enabling the perpetrators free rein to sexually abuse schoolgirls for decades. Yes, decades. We know that in an age where parents are not allowed to smack
their children, this sounds unbelievable.»
The report shows that even documents that supposedly address the problem of child grooming have gone out of their way to avoid discussing why some «ethnic groups»
are massively over-represented as perpetrators—the study calculates that Muslims are 154 times more likely to be perpetrators of these crimes than non-Muslims—while the schoolgirl victims are overwhelmingly of a different ethnic group.
«The perpetrators have been overwhelmingly men from Muslim communities, and the victims have been overwhelmingly girls from non-Muslim communities (Sikhs, Christians and Atheists). Yet the professionals never deemed
it important to declare this, or even denied the pattern existed.»
«Despite government agencies in Rotherham [a large town in South Yorkshire, England] knowing about (and privately discussing) the Muslim
grooming gangs from 1996, a 2010 document by Rotherham Safeguarding Children Board stated that ‘great care will be taken in drafting…this report to ensure that its findings embrace Rotherham’s qualities of diversity. It is imperative that
suggestions of a wider cultural phenomenon are avoided.’»
One of the defining features of child grooming is the ethnic/cultural homogeneity of the gang members, and the refusal of other members of their
community to speak out about them or to condemn their behavior. According to the report, the gangs are often made up of brothers and members of their extended family, many from Pakistan, who take part in the grooming and/or rape of the schoolgirls.
The report states that grooming gangs target young girls, aged between 11 and 16, because the gang members want virgins and girls who are free of sexual diseases. «Most of the men buying sex with the girls have Muslim
wives and they don’t want to risk infection,» the report states. «The younger you look, the more saleable you are.»
«The schoolgirls they target are overwhelmingly non-Muslim, while
the gangs are overwhelmingly Muslim. The girls are often lured into the clutches of the gang using a young Muslim man who befriends/seduces the girl. None of this is accidental; here we are not talking about cross-cultural romantic relationships. What is so
unusual about this disparity in ethnicity, is that mostly Muslims in Britain have little or no interaction with the indigenous population.»
The scale of the problem is truly horrifying. According to Parents against Child Sexual Exploitation (PACE), a national charity focused on working with the victims of child grooming and their families, at least 10,000 British children are in the clutches of the gangs at any
one time, and at least 1,000 new girls are being groomed by gangs each year.
But this is «just the tip of the iceberg,» according to a document
published by the House of Commons, which estimates that at least 20,000 British children are at risk of sexual exploitation by grooming gangs.
Meanwhile, prosecutions are few and far between. The report
calculates that for every man convicted of such crimes, there are between two to ten other men who were directly implicated, but for whom there was insufficient evidence to secure a conviction. «If this is true,» the authors write, «it means
that with this crime there are very many perpetrators getting away with it.»
Finally, the authors of the report examine the links between Islamic culture and doctrine and the crime of child grooming. They
«There is not one case where it was non-Muslim men grooming Muslim girls, and that despite the fact that 95% of the men in Britain are not Muslims…There is no evidence at all that non-Muslim men
are grooming Muslim children, but ample evidence that Muslim men are directing their grooming at non-Muslim schoolgirls.»
At the same time, «the notion that Islam could be the basis for this criminality
is always ruled out of the question, with no investigation of Islamic theology, the history of Islam, or the rulings of Sharia law.»
The authors then provide a thorough examination of Islamic sacred texts
(pp. 222-268) and conclude, among other observations:
1) «The laws in various Islamic states show that they think that Aisha [who was married to Mohammad at the age of six] was under 10 when Mohammed had sex
with her. And to Muslims, Mohammed is regarded as the perfect man; it is part of their religion that they should emulate his behavior.»
2) «Muslim men are taught in mosques that women are second-class
citizens, little more than chattels or possessions over whom they have absolute authority.»
3) «The Koran makes a distinction between legal wives and slaves, and instructs Muslim men that they can have
sex with either their wives or their slaves.»
4) «Not only are Muslim men permitted legally and morally to rape their slaves, but they are also forgiven if they turn a slave girl into a prostitute.»
5) «There are also features of Islam which are supremacist and which look with contempt at non-Muslims.»
6) «The Hadiths also permit Muslims to rape women who
are captured after a battle (whereupon they become the property of Muslims, that is, they become slaves).»
At the same time, British judges are increasingly using Islamic Sharia law to justify light sentences
for Muslims who rape underage girls:
«As late as May 2013, the media were reporting that a Muslim man in Nottingham who had ‘raped’ an underage girl, was spared a prison term after the judge heard
that the naïve 18-year-old attended an Islamic faith school where he was taught that women are worthless. Rashid told psychologists he had no idea that having sex with a willing 13-year-old was against the law; besides, his education had taught him to
believe that ‘women are no more worthy than a lollipop that has been dropped on the ground.’»
The report is emphatic in blaming the doctrine of multiculturalism for Britain’s lack of resolve
in confronting the grooming gangs:
«Multiculturalism is a fundamentally incoherent doctrine, invented to conceal the serious conflicts which have arisen when peoples from vastly different cultures, with different
values, are forced to live together.»
«Political correctness and the doctrine of multiculturalism meant that the professionals whose job it was to help the vulnerable were consciously commanding that
these diverse cultural values could not be discussed.»
«Multiculturalism came about in order to deny that there is any significance to cultures having different values and to conceal that there will
be conflict when these incompatible values come together. Political correctness is the means by which such denial is enforced.»
«Those who propound and defend multiculturalism say that people from different
cultural backgrounds have different values, and that we must all accept these values as being of equal validity. But when it comes to examining what those different values are, multiculturalists suddenly lose interest in the details of these differences and
lose interest in the consequences that follow from these different values. Yet we have seen, that even those Muslims who are classified as liberal or moderate have views which would be considered extreme if those views were espoused by a non-Muslim in Britain.
Are we really surprised that conflicts and problems arise when communities with different values are living side-by-side? These conflicts are just concealed by the advocates of multiculturalism. Proponents of multiculturalism dare not examine the views of
Islamic fundamentalists, that (significant) minority of Muslims in Britain who want Sharia law.»
«Multiculturalists think that Muslims will embrace multiculturalism; yet Islam was established 1,300 years
ago to destroy multiculturalism.»
«Islamic society is a totalitarian society, all other values are to be subordinated to Islamic values. But if anyone in Britain dares to criticize Islam, they will be
denounced and told they live in a multicultural society, and must accept these totalitarian values.»
The report concludes: «Every decade, the Muslim population of Britain almost doubles in size, so there
is every reason to believe that without some massive changes in our society, the activities of these gangs will grow and grow.»